Dutch Holding Companies and PFIC Considerations for U.S. Entrepreneur

TLDR – What do I need to do?

A Dutch personal holding company can be a powerful instrument for deferral and long-term wealth planning under Dutch law. Yet for U.S. citizens, the same structure can inadvertently trigger the PFIC regime, resulting in punitive taxation and extensive compliance.

An alternative — holding investments personally, paying Box 3 tax, and crediting it against U.S. capital gains or investment income — can often produce a cleaner and more predictable outcome.

As with all cross-border structures, the most effective solution is one that integrates both systems coherently. Specialist advice from an advisor experienced in Dutch–U.S. tax matters is indispensable. With thoughtful planning, U.S. entrepreneurs relocating to the Netherlands can preserve the benefits of Dutch fiscal efficiency without inviting unnecessary U.S. complexity.

Questions about your Dutch holding structure?
Our tax advisors help you assess whether your Dutch BV qualifies for exemptions and avoid U.S. PFIC issues. Ensure your structure is compliant and efficient.
Schedule a free consultation

Dutch Holding Companies and PFIC Considerations for U.S. Entrepreneurs

For internationally oriented entrepreneurs, the Netherlands offers an appealing combination of stability, access to European markets, and a sophisticated tax framework. It is common for business owners and investors to establish a Dutch personal holding company — often a Besloten Vennootschap (BV) — to hold investments, manage liquidity, and defer personal taxation.

From a Dutch perspective, this structure can be remarkably efficient. However, for U.S. citizens and green card holders, it introduces a complex interaction with the Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) rules under U.S. tax law. What serves as a legitimate tax planning tool in the Netherlands may, in U.S. terms, constitute an anti-deferral concern.

The Dutch Tax Context: Holding Companies and Box 3

The Dutch personal income tax system is divided into three “Boxes”:

  • Box 1: income from work or business (progressive rates)
  • Box 2: income from substantial shareholdings (≥ 5% ownership in a company)
  • Box 3: income from savings and investments

A personal holding BV typically falls within Box 2. Income from the BV — such as dividends or capital gains — is taxed at the moment it is distributed to the shareholder. By contrast, Box 3 applies an annual tax on the assumed return of an individual’s net assets, regardless of the actual yield.

In recent years, the Box 3 system has become more burdensome for individuals with moderate or low investment returns. The tax authority applies a deemed rate of return that can significantly exceed actual performance.

Holding assets within a BV removes them from Box 3 entirely. The BV pays corporate income tax only on actual investment income, while the shareholder incurs Box 2 tax only upon distribution. The benefits are clear:

  • No annual wealth tax on investment base – allowing for a larger compound effect
  • Taxation based on real rather than deemed income
  • Deferral of personal taxation until distributions occur
  • Access to the Dutch participation exemption for qualifying shareholdings

For Dutch residents, and for many expatriates after their 30% ruling expires (the box 2 and box 3 exemption has been abolished as of 1 January 2025), the personal holding BV remains an elegant way to preserve after-tax wealth and reinvest profits efficiently. 

The U.S. Overlay: PFIC Implications

U.S. citizens remain subject to worldwide taxation, irrespective of residence. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code contains anti-deferral provisions that target passive income accumulated in foreign corporations.

A non-U.S. company is classified as a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) if:

  1. At least 75% of its gross income is passive (interest, dividends, or capital gains), or
  2. At least 50% of its assets produce passive income.

A Dutch holding BV that mainly holds investments will generally meet both tests. Once a company is considered a PFIC, the U.S. tax consequences can be significant:

  • Distributions and gains may be taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gains.
  • Interest charges are imposed to recapture the perceived deferral of U.S. tax.
  • Annual reporting (Form 8621) is required, creating ongoing compliance obligations.

For Americans, the PFIC regime can therefore offset the Dutch benefits that make the holding BV attractive in the first place.

It is always paramount when in doubt, to reach out to a US tax advisor to assist you in these matters. We are happy to refer you to one of our US partnered firms.

A Practical Alternative: Accept Box 3 and Claim Foreign Tax Credits

In certain circumstances, a more straightforward approach yields a better overall outcome. Instead of using a BV, some U.S. taxpayers opt to hold investments personally, accept the Dutch Box 3 tax, and then credit that tax against their U.S. tax liability on the same income.

This alternative offers several advantages:

  • It avoids PFIC classification and the associated reporting requirements.
  • The Dutch tax paid under Box 3 can typically be used as a foreign tax credit against U.S. investment income or capital gains.
  • Administrative complexity is greatly reduced, as the taxpayer avoids maintaining dual accounting for corporate and individual layers.

Although Box 3 operates as a deemed-return system, the effective Dutch tax burden — particularly once credited against U.S. tax — can be entirely acceptable. For many, the simplicity and predictability outweigh the potential (and often illusory) deferral benefit of a personal BV.

Structuring Considerations

Choosing between a Dutch personal holding BV and direct personal ownership depends on the nature of the assets and the taxpayer’s long-term objectives:

  • Entrepreneurs who expect to reinvest profits in an active business structure often benefit from a BV, especially when the participation exemption applies.
  • Passive investors may prefer direct ownership, as it avoids PFIC exposure and simplifies compliance.

In either case, careful coordination between Dutch and U.S. tax rules is essential. The optimal solution depends on residence status, the duration of the 30% ruling, investment profile, and the anticipated flow of income or gains

Geschreven door:

Richard Bierlaagh

Tax Partner

Richard is al meer dan 10 jaar actief in de fiscale wereld. Met ervaring bij Big Four kantoren en actief als auteur.

Lees meer
Geschreven door:

Richard Bierlaagh

Tax Partner

Richard is al meer dan 10 jaar actief in de fiscale wereld. Met ervaring bij Big Four kantoren en actief als auteur.

Contact opnemen

Vrijblijvend Adviesgesprek

Meer weten over dit onderwerp? Boek een gratis consult met een van onze specialisten.

Boek een afspraak
In 1 min. geregeld